Democracy in Divided Societies
As I have noted many times on this blog, the United States is heavily engaged in trying to catalyze democracy in some of the world’s most divided countries, such as Afghanistan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Iraq. Thanksgiving, the United States’ most unique holiday, is a good time to consider the difficulty of building democracy in divided societies. The reason is not because of the fine example of democracy the US provides, but because of the warning.
The United States emerged from the Revolutionary War as a deeply divided society. Tyranny of the majority, specifically southerners’ fear that the larger population of the north and its general hostility to slavery threatened their interests, was one of the main cleavages. Like the US advocates in many divided societies today, the US Constitution created a variation of power sharing to ally these fears, most prominently decentralization (federalism) and over-representation of states with small populations in the legislature (the Senate).
Power sharing did not alleviate southerners’ concerns. Subsequent compromises, such as the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850, also ultimately failed. In the event, the country descended into civil war, the south was economically and militarily decimated, and the north militarily occupied the south after the war, imposing a new set of institutions, such as voting rights for African-Americans, that most white southerners resisted. Reconstruction also led to the rise of terrorist groups seeking to drive out northern troops and intimidate blacks from exercising their rights.
The cost and difficulties of reconstruction caused the north to lose interest in it and the military occupation ended in 1877. Following the withdrawal, African-Americans lost almost all the rights granted to them during reconstruction. Thus, while the war eliminated slavery and the threat of succession, reconstruction failed to bring anything close to democracy and equality to African-Americans.
It seems to me that US history can provide three lessons for considering whether the US can help facilitate democracy in divided societies today:
- No matter how clever the institutional design, power sharing is fragile if a minority fears domination.
- Imposing new institutions is an expensive, long-term, and painful process.
- Political support in the US to impose these new institutions must be very strong.
Leave a comment
Sign up for our mailing list
Posts by Region
Posts by Topic
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2012 (5)
- January 2012 (13)
- December 2011 (10)
- November 2011 (14)
- October 2011 (19)
- September 2011 (25)
- August 2011 (10)
- July 2011 (16)
- June 2011 (14)
- May 2011 (14)
- April 2011 (16)
- March 2011 (20)
- February 2011 (15)
- January 2011 (24)
- December 2010 (16)
- November 2010 (24)
- October 2010 (27)
- September 2010 (17)
- August 2010 (42)
- July 2010 (40)
- June 2010 (65)
- May 2010 (72)
- April 2010 (38)
- March 2010 (18)
- February 2010 (32)
- January 2010 (46)
- December 2009 (45)
- November 2009 (38)
- October 2009 (15)
- September 2009 (24)
- August 2009 (11)
- February 2009 (1)
Who we like
- AfPak Channel
- CIPE Blog
- Countries at the Crossroads
- Cyrus Samii
- Democracy Arsenal
- Democracy Dialogue
- Democracy Digest
- Democracy Resource Center
- EITI Blog
- ElectionGuide.org
- Fruits and Votes
- Global Voices Online
- One Blog
- Open Budgets Blog
- Open Democracy
- Policy and Power
- Progressive Realist
- Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Blogs
- Space for Transparency
- The Coming Prosperity
- The Democratic Piece
- The International Jurist
- The Kaufmann Governance Post
- United Nations Democracy Fund
- Zunia.org



