Is Obama turning the corner on democracy?
Secretary Clinton outlined the administration’s human rights policy today in a speech at Georgetown University. The speech made clear that supporting democracy is going to be a foreign policy priority. According to Clinton:
…supporting democracy and fostering development are cornerstones of our 21st century human rights agenda.
This administration, like others before us, will promote, support, and defend democracy. We will relinquish neither the word nor the idea to those who have used it too narrowly, or to justify unwise policies. We stand for democracy not because we want other countries to be like us, but because we want all people to enjoy consistent protection of the rights that are naturally theirs, whether they were born in Tallahassee or Tehran. Democracy has proven the best political system for making human rights a human reality over the long term…
With China, Russia, and others, we are engaging on issues of mutual interest while also engaging societal actors in these same countries who are working to advance human rights and democracy. The assumption that we must either pursue human rights or our “national interests” is wrong.
…conscience demands that we are not cowed by the overwhelming difficulty of making inroads against misery in the hard places like Sudan, Democratic Republic of Congo, North Korea, and Zimbabwe, or on the hard issues like ending gender inequality and discrimination against gays and lesbians—from the Middle East to Latin America, Africa to Asia…
A change has taken place fairly rapidly within the Obama administration. Even as short as a few weeks ago, many were claiming democracy would not be a priority. Yet, in the span of three weeks, we have seen three big foreign policy speeches that suggest this is not true, Obama at West Point and in Oslo for the Nobel Prize, and Clinton today. While I predicted the administration would eventually embrace democracy, I did not expect it this quickly. I am very pleased.
Michael Allen at Democracy Digest and the Project on Middle East Democracy (POMED) has more.
2 Comments
Leave a comment
Sign up for our mailing list
Posts by Region
Posts by Topic
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2012 (5)
- January 2012 (13)
- December 2011 (10)
- November 2011 (14)
- October 2011 (19)
- September 2011 (25)
- August 2011 (10)
- July 2011 (16)
- June 2011 (14)
- May 2011 (14)
- April 2011 (16)
- March 2011 (20)
- February 2011 (15)
- January 2011 (24)
- December 2010 (16)
- November 2010 (24)
- October 2010 (27)
- September 2010 (17)
- August 2010 (42)
- July 2010 (40)
- June 2010 (65)
- May 2010 (72)
- April 2010 (38)
- March 2010 (18)
- February 2010 (32)
- January 2010 (46)
- December 2009 (45)
- November 2009 (38)
- October 2009 (15)
- September 2009 (24)
- August 2009 (11)
- February 2009 (1)
Who we like
- AfPak Channel
- CIPE Blog
- Countries at the Crossroads
- Cyrus Samii
- Democracy Arsenal
- Democracy Dialogue
- Democracy Digest
- Democracy Resource Center
- EITI Blog
- ElectionGuide.org
- Fruits and Votes
- Global Voices Online
- One Blog
- Open Budgets Blog
- Open Democracy
- Policy and Power
- Progressive Realist
- Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Blogs
- Space for Transparency
- The Coming Prosperity
- The Democratic Piece
- The International Jurist
- The Kaufmann Governance Post
- United Nations Democracy Fund
- Zunia.org




Why are we to assume that this speech signifies anything? The optimism expressed in this blog post is similiar to the international outpour after Obama’s Cairo speech. These words mean nothing until the U.S. follows through on them. As expressed in your comments in the “Obama Needs A Vision Check” post you asserted that Obama has not done nearly enough to support democracy in Tehran, so why believe that Clinton’s speech is anything else other than words on paper?
I was thinking the exact same thing. You are right. It’s only words, but three speeches in three weeks does signify a shift in thinking. Moreover, these are words we can now use to push the administration. Plus, Obama’s Cairo speech didn’t talk at all about what the US would do to support democracy. Clinton’s speech presented a plan.