-
26
Jan
The Washington Post reports that US strategy in Afghanistan includes bribing Taliban foot-soldiers not to fight:
Britain and Japan have agreed to head an international fund, expected to total up to $500 million over the next five years, as part of a broad plan to help lure Taliban fighters away from the insurgency with the promise of jobs, protection against retaliation, and the removal of their names from lists of U.S. and NATO targets.
Bernard Finel focuses on the likely futility of this approach:
…what is the long-term here? You out-compete the Taliban financially for the loyalty of apolitical fighters. Then what? The reality is that this creates a durable political economy that supports violence and warfare. There is going to be an entire class of people whose well-being depends on continued payments, and who have the ability to extort more money simply by turning back to violence. This is the institutionalization of an extortion scheme.
Exactly. This is going to turn into a game where people join the Taliban just so they can get a payment not to fight. In fact, one would probably only need to threaten to join the Taliban to get into the program. This is going to create an endless supply of people who want handouts.
Moreover, the whole program seems rather pointless. People will only join the program if they believe the US and its allies will be able to defeat the Taliban. If they do not, they have very little incentive to join it. Since the success of the program directly hinges on whether people believe the US can win, why start it? Why not spend the time and money trying to win the war?
I can see some logic of the program because it is likely to weaken the Taliban in the short-term by making it difficult for them to recruit. If it was in the context of a broader, coherent, and credible strategy to defeat the Taliban, I suppose I could support it. But as this article demonstrates, its not clear this is the strategy and even if it were, Pakistan’s opposition to it means the likelihood of defeating the Taliban is very low. On the other hand, if our policy is to negotiate with “moderate” Taliban (whatever that means), it seems to me we do not need the jobs program. In fact, using the lure of jobs might give the Taliban an incentive to negotiate.
I agree with Les Gelb:
McChrystal and the others’ hope is that the United States will be able to outbid the Taliban leadership for the services of some of these fighters. It’s also clear that neither President Karzai nor the Americans will know if this gambit will work until it is tried, and until they see that these fighters do not return to the Taliban’s fold in six months’ to a year’s time.
(Deep sigh) It’s quite sad that 8 years into this war we are still trying to find out what works and what does not. Extrapolating from this means that the US is more likely to defeat the Taliban (or negotiate a successful end to the war) by luck than by strategy.
- Published by Barak in: Blog
2 Responses to “Outbidding the Taliban”
I think “futility” is a pretty strong word for this idea. Sure it’s far from certain how successful this program will be, but that doesn’t mean it can’t be one important part of a larger strategy. I don’t know why we should assume that someone’s incentive to join is completely dependent on who they think would win the war. If that was the case, could we assume that anyone who signed up for the bribes inevitably felt the Taliban was destined to lose? You can’t make the statement that they are apolitical fighters and then turn around and say nobody will join anyway. As you mentioned, it doesn’t have to completely cripple the Taliban, but sucking away a base of support isn’t insignificant. I thought one of the most embarrassing revelations of the war came when it was learned Taliban fighters were being paid better than government ones. If this program is run successful, it can go a long way in altering incentives.
On the topic, Peter Neumann, wrote his thoughts about this in Der Spiegel: http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,674593,00.html
Two points. One, I don’t think that people will join depending on who they think will win the war. Rather (and I should have made this clear), I was talking about this in the context of the credibility of Taliban threats. The Taliban has a history of punishing people who cooperate with the US. What I meant was that this threat needs to recede for the program to work. Two, I agree that it would work in the context of a larger strategy. The problem is that strategy does not exist. It appears now that Karzai is determined to negotiate with the Taliban and bring them into a power-sharing agreement. Thus, in a very short period of time, the policy has changed from weakening the Taliban to negotiating with them. If this is the case, why do we need a program to outbid Taliban foot soldiers?
Leave a Reply