Mar 17, 2010
Mariel

Rwanda and Democracy

Texas in Africa picks up on an article in the Independent by Daniel Howden describing the difficulties – including intimidation and violence – that Rwanda’s Green Party* faces in attempting to register for this year’s elections.  Pres. Kagame has openly warned the leader of another opposition party that she could be prosecuted under Rwanda’s anti-genocide laws, which Howden says are used more often as a bureaucratic blockade than a tool for securing peace.

I like Texas in Africa’s post also for the nice job of explaining some of the staples of democracy/governance studies – consolidated democracies, semi-authoritarian regimes – and how we can apply them to Rwanda.  The shenanigans described above make it the latter, rather than the former.

The comments also include an interesting discussion about whether or not banning specific parties – Communist, Nazi – make a country less consolidated.

* Ironically, Rwanda is also the host of this year’s UN World Environment Day.

1 Comment

  • Rwanda is not semi-authoritarian, its authoritarian. Kagame is popular because he restored order out of chaos, much like Musevini did in Uganda. A person who can do this is likely to be an authoritarian. The trick is to get Kagame out before he decides that he would like to be president for life and loot the state for personal benefit.

Leave a comment

The MA in Democracy and Governance at Georgetown University is now accepting applications for the 2012-2013 academic year. Find out more.
Founded in 2004, Democracy and Society is a biannual print journal published by the Center for Democracy and Civil Society at Georgetown University. The D&S Blog provides web-only content, including special reports and investigative series, on issues relating to democracy and development.

Sign up for our mailing list

Posts by Region

Posts by Topic

Switch to our mobile site