May 4, 2010
Barak

Cohesive parties are bad for Afghanistan

MA in Democracy and Governance alum Jack Santucci weighs in against donor consensus that Afghanistan needs more cohesive political parties at the Democratic Piece:

I wonder whether the ’strong’ parties that might result from more party-centric electoral rules would be all that great. If, for example, closed-list PR turns divided societies’ elections into “national identity referenda,”would programmatic coherence and party discipline be such great ideas?

I agree completely. A more cohesive party system is only likely to sharpen ethnic tension in Afghanistan. The country has enough problems already. Weak parties are probably an asset.

Leave a comment

The MA in Democracy and Governance at Georgetown University is now accepting applications for the 2012-2013 academic year. Find out more.
Founded in 2004, Democracy and Society is a biannual print journal published by the Center for Democracy and Civil Society at Georgetown University. The D&S Blog provides web-only content, including special reports and investigative series, on issues relating to democracy and development.

Sign up for our mailing list

Posts by Region

Posts by Topic

Switch to our mobile site