Oct 7, 2010
Barak

F

It seems to me that something like the the F process – the effective merging of USAID funding with foreign policy priorities- was probably an inevitable result of USAID’s growth. The agency could stay autonomous when it was small, but this is an unrealistic expectation for a large government agency. More to the point, USAID needs to answer why it should be large and autonomous. I get the point that from an operational perspective, independence from US foreign policy is something that USAID desires. Why US taxpayers ought to fund such an agency is a different question. The argument that if USAID wants to be big, it needs to justify its budgets through US foreign policy priorities is a strong one. I understand why USAID doesn’t like F. USAID needs to make a better case for why the US government should get rid of it.

Leave a comment

Founded in 2004, Democracy and Society is a biannual print journal published by the Center for Democracy and Civil Society at Georgetown University. The D&S Blog provides web-only content, including special reports and investigative series, on issues relating to democracy and development.

Sign up for our mailing list

Posts by Region

Posts by Topic

Switch to our mobile site