Wall Street’s tears are annoying me
I was watching a discussion on CNBC this morning about why the private sector in the US remains so weak. The ubiquitous talking point is that the Obama administration is creating “uncertainty in the markets.” The private sector is thus a victim of the Obama administration’s weak management of the economy. If this argument is true, then data on economic competitiveness ought to show that the US in an uncompetitive economy. Not surprisingly, the data do not support the argument that the government is strangling the private sector in the US. According to the World Economic Forum, the US is the fourth most competitive economy in the world and according to the World Bank, the US is the fifth easiest country in the world for doing business.
Why the brains at CNBC have never thought to question whether the bellyaching from Wall Street is true or not I can’t say. Nor do I have any insight as to why companies that complain about uncertainty in the US have no problems doing business in countries with much more uncertainty, such as China, Nigeria, and Mexico. What I can say is that it’s nauseating to watch commercials on CNBC that celebrate the intrepid private sector in the US and watch these same corporations whine about how the government isn’t coddling them enough in interviews on that same station. Maybe if these folks spent less time moaning about their victimhood and more time innovating the economy would be in better shape.
2 Comments
Leave a comment
Posts by Region
Posts by Topic
Recent Comments
- Barak on The Persistence of Justice
- PEstrada on The Persistence of Justice
- Barak on The Persistence of Justice
Archives
- May 2013 (9)
- April 2013 (13)
- March 2013 (19)
- February 2013 (21)
- January 2013 (16)
- December 2012 (12)
- November 2012 (14)
- October 2012 (21)
- September 2012 (21)
- August 2012 (8)
- July 2012 (13)
- June 2012 (17)
- May 2012 (6)
- April 2012 (9)
- March 2012 (16)
- February 2012 (20)
- January 2012 (13)
- December 2011 (10)
- November 2011 (14)
- October 2011 (19)
- September 2011 (25)
- August 2011 (10)
- July 2011 (16)
- June 2011 (14)
- May 2011 (14)
- April 2011 (16)
- March 2011 (20)
- February 2011 (15)
- January 2011 (24)
- December 2010 (16)
- November 2010 (24)
- October 2010 (27)
- September 2010 (17)
- August 2010 (42)
- July 2010 (40)
- June 2010 (65)
- May 2010 (72)
- April 2010 (38)
- March 2010 (18)
- February 2010 (32)
- January 2010 (46)
- December 2009 (45)
- November 2009 (38)
- October 2009 (15)
- September 2009 (24)
- August 2009 (11)
- February 2009 (1)
Who we like
- AfPak Channel
- CIPE Blog
- Countries at the Crossroads
- Cyrus Samii
- Democracy Arsenal
- Democracy Dialogue
- Democracy Digest
- Democracy Resource Center
- EITI Blog
- ElectionGuide.org
- Fruits and Votes
- Global Voices Online
- One Blog
- Open Budgets Blog
- Open Democracy
- Policy and Power
- Progressive Realist
- Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Blogs
- Space for Transparency
- The Coming Prosperity
- The Democratic Piece
- The International Jurist
- The Kaufmann Governance Post
- United Nations Democracy Fund
- Zunia.org




Agreed, but I’d argue that the picture being painted by CBS and other media outlets is an intentional one. I know I tend to be a cynic when it comes to economics but I think that generally the lack of understanding most of the populace has of this stuff is consciously taken advantage of by our media in hopes of advancing policy change or public outrage. What I find disappointing is how rarely these sorts of claims are contested, I mean it seems almost status quo lately that regulation and government policy is at the core of our economic trouble.
I was being a bit polemical when I wrote that I don’t know why the folks on CNBC are crying so much. I think I’m more cynical than you. I suspect the reason they are doing this is because they would rather have economic regulation that guarantees them profits than one that promotes a more competitive private sector. Their goal, I suspect, is political protection, period.