China & Political Change
Regularly in these last few weeks, political thinkers have risked curious and typically hopeful glances toward China for signs that the political change demanded in the Middle East might spread to the Chinese regime as well. A number of comparative analyses have contrasted the Chinese government with any number of the Middle Eastern states currently locked in turmoil or transitioning to new regimes. Though I’m of the mind that said analyses are somewhat far-fetched, I do think the activities of the Chinese government in recent weeks deserve a great deal of attention. At present China’s ties and investments into the politics of the Middle East are extensive, and the activities of the Chinese government through crises like that in Libya offer potential insight into policy in the years ahead.
Readers may note I’m hardly the first to expect changes to the status quo, but particularly in China it seems an absurd conclusion to leap to at the moment. Beyond the differences between China and the States of the Middle East, or the continued economic, social, strategic and political developments of the state, it’s hard to imagine how the rest of the world might react if demands for political change suddenly delegitimized China’s government. Further the constant risk of these uprisings being labeled Western meddling, rather than a movement among the people of the region, might suggest this is a good time to work with China on issues of foreign affairs, instead of labeling this one more US vs. China battleground.
Counter to what some might think, the people of China have not been kept ignorant of events in the Middle East; however the information made available to them has been limited and manipulated in all the ways typical of the nation’s government. Essentially the government’s approach has been to control access to, and sanitize presentation of, information which might be inflammatory or in some way negatively affect stability in the nation. Here, if nowhere else, China does its people a great disservice.
Though quite effective in governing a nation through swift and effective transition toward convergence with the wealthiest nations of the world, the state has painted a picture of itself which seems at times even more heavy-handed than might be necessary. Certainly the Chinese government is authoritarian in nature, yet often it seems intent on displaying its power and influence over its citizenry purely for the sake of reminding the populace of its dominance.
3 Comments
Leave a comment
Sign up for our mailing list
Posts by Region
Posts by Topic
Recent Comments
Archives
- May 2012 (3)
- April 2012 (9)
- March 2012 (16)
- February 2012 (20)
- January 2012 (13)
- December 2011 (10)
- November 2011 (14)
- October 2011 (19)
- September 2011 (25)
- August 2011 (10)
- July 2011 (16)
- June 2011 (14)
- May 2011 (14)
- April 2011 (16)
- March 2011 (20)
- February 2011 (15)
- January 2011 (24)
- December 2010 (16)
- November 2010 (24)
- October 2010 (27)
- September 2010 (17)
- August 2010 (42)
- July 2010 (40)
- June 2010 (65)
- May 2010 (72)
- April 2010 (38)
- March 2010 (18)
- February 2010 (32)
- January 2010 (46)
- December 2009 (45)
- November 2009 (38)
- October 2009 (15)
- September 2009 (24)
- August 2009 (11)
- February 2009 (1)
Who we like
- AfPak Channel
- CIPE Blog
- Countries at the Crossroads
- Cyrus Samii
- Democracy Arsenal
- Democracy Dialogue
- Democracy Digest
- Democracy Resource Center
- EITI Blog
- ElectionGuide.org
- Fruits and Votes
- Global Voices Online
- One Blog
- Open Budgets Blog
- Open Democracy
- Policy and Power
- Progressive Realist
- Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Blogs
- Space for Transparency
- The Coming Prosperity
- The Democratic Piece
- The International Jurist
- The Kaufmann Governance Post
- United Nations Democracy Fund
- Zunia.org




It seems far-fetched to me to expect that upheaval in some non-democracies should mean upheaval in all non-democracies. Should we expect revolution in Cuba? What about Cameroon? Besides not being democracies, non-democracies do not have much in common. To expect what resonates on the Arab street to have currency in China seems like very lazy thinking.
the jasmine does have frightened the Chinese authority, they couldn’t be more hypersensitive in these days. Revolution in China? Perhaps when next wave comes. Expecting another Gorbachev who will make change from inside is however unrealistic, I personally don’t think Hu and his successor have the resolution and power to initiate genuine political reform. therefore externalities are crucial, whether international or domestic.
Thanks for the insight Yuan, I certainly agree regarding the government’s hypersensitivity. I mean its utterly understandable that a government should be concerned for the stability of the state, but at times China’s approach to governance is puzzling even through the lens of authoritarianism.