<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama &amp; Our Conflict in Libya</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2011/03/28/obama-our-conflict-in-libya/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2011/03/28/obama-our-conflict-in-libya/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obama-our-conflict-in-libya</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 01:59:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imara</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2011/03/28/obama-our-conflict-in-libya/comment-page-1/#comment-5316</link>
		<dc:creator>Imara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/?p=5427#comment-5316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t really agree that said commentary should have made the speech useless.  The economic woes and ongoing conflicts left by the Bush administration have been a Democratic party talking point for pretty much the whole of Obama&#039;s presidency, and I don&#039;t know that the talking point has had much negative impact overall.  Are they annoying? Definitely. Do they give political pundits fodder to rage over? Obviously. But we&#039;ve definitely got something of a short memory as a nation, so perhaps these reminders are useful even if they ring at this point as future campaign trail rhetoric.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really agree that said commentary should have made the speech useless.  The economic woes and ongoing conflicts left by the Bush administration have been a Democratic party talking point for pretty much the whole of Obama&#8217;s presidency, and I don&#8217;t know that the talking point has had much negative impact overall.  Are they annoying? Definitely. Do they give political pundits fodder to rage over? Obviously. But we&#8217;ve definitely got something of a short memory as a nation, so perhaps these reminders are useful even if they ring at this point as future campaign trail rhetoric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrystal</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2011/03/28/obama-our-conflict-in-libya/comment-page-1/#comment-5196</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrystal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/?p=5427#comment-5196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama&#039;s speech was probably useless, because he brought up Iraq a couple of times and just had to slam W. Bush for the costs.... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s speech was probably useless, because he brought up Iraq a couple of times and just had to slam W. Bush for the costs&#8230;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
