Thoughts on Oslo
I’m not a terrorism or Norway expert, so I’m not going to try to make any policy point about the horrible events that took place today. I will just say that during my recent trip, I was stunned by the noticeable amount of trust Norwegian society and institutions placed in one another. I actually didn’t realize I passed the parliament the first time I did on account of the fact that there were no visible security measures; you could simply walk right up to the walls. The same could be said about the royal palace, which was guarded only by a friendly military officer.
It wasn’t just protection of key buildings were I sensed a great deal of trust, however. Security at the airport was a remarkable contrast to the United States. I never went through customs and felt almost as if I walked off the airplane out of the airport. There was also no ticket booth on public transport; buying tickets was by and large done on the honor system. This contrast was really made evident coming back to the US, when I had to fill out my customary form declaring I didn’t touch any livestock or bring home any soil, only to wait in the long security line.
To be sure there are reasons for these differences. But regardless of whether more security is the correct policy response or not, I found the level of trust in Norway to be beautiful and it would be upsetting if that changed.

Royal Palace (Photo property of David Jandura)

The Norwegian Parliament (Storting) Photo property of David Jandura
1 Comment
Leave a comment
Posts by Region
Posts by Topic
Recent Comments
- Barak on The Persistence of Justice
- PEstrada on The Persistence of Justice
- Barak on The Persistence of Justice
Archives
- May 2013 (10)
- April 2013 (13)
- March 2013 (19)
- February 2013 (21)
- January 2013 (16)
- December 2012 (12)
- November 2012 (14)
- October 2012 (21)
- September 2012 (21)
- August 2012 (8)
- July 2012 (13)
- June 2012 (17)
- May 2012 (6)
- April 2012 (9)
- March 2012 (16)
- February 2012 (20)
- January 2012 (13)
- December 2011 (10)
- November 2011 (14)
- October 2011 (19)
- September 2011 (25)
- August 2011 (10)
- July 2011 (16)
- June 2011 (14)
- May 2011 (14)
- April 2011 (16)
- March 2011 (20)
- February 2011 (15)
- January 2011 (24)
- December 2010 (16)
- November 2010 (24)
- October 2010 (27)
- September 2010 (17)
- August 2010 (42)
- July 2010 (40)
- June 2010 (65)
- May 2010 (72)
- April 2010 (38)
- March 2010 (18)
- February 2010 (32)
- January 2010 (46)
- December 2009 (45)
- November 2009 (38)
- October 2009 (15)
- September 2009 (24)
- August 2009 (11)
- February 2009 (1)
Who we like
- AfPak Channel
- CIPE Blog
- Countries at the Crossroads
- Cyrus Samii
- Democracy Arsenal
- Democracy Dialogue
- Democracy Digest
- Democracy Resource Center
- EITI Blog
- ElectionGuide.org
- Fruits and Votes
- Global Voices Online
- One Blog
- Open Budgets Blog
- Open Democracy
- Policy and Power
- Progressive Realist
- Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Blogs
- Space for Transparency
- The Coming Prosperity
- The Democratic Piece
- The International Jurist
- The Kaufmann Governance Post
- United Nations Democracy Fund
- Zunia.org




I suspect that very few people would disagree with you. The problem is that troublemakers (be they terrorists or simply run of the mill muggers) always look for the weak link. Norway may not be a priority target, but at the moment it may be an easy one. They may need to tighten security solely for that reason. It’s a ratchet effect: if all my neighbors get high-tech security, then the probability that my house will be a target rises. Thus, I’ll need to get better security as well, even if this was not my first preference.