Politics and Austerity: Modern Tragedy in Greece
I’ve written here and there and there on the ongoing economic struggles of Greece, the broader European Union and the role of austerity politics in the area. As the situation remains somewhat depressing it seemed a reasonable time to check in on the often uncomfortable interplay between resources and democracy.
The ongoing drama of the search for a unity government and the demoralizing realities of the October 26th agreement paint a bleak picture for the nation’s politicians in the days ahead. With good reason no one appears interested in leading a government that will essentially have to force unpopular measures on its populace. Even if economic changes are clearly necessary for the long term good of the nation, when the strongest demands for said measures come from outside governance, the pill becomes that much more difficult to swallow.
Perhaps more importantly however the nature of the agreement suggests some unfortunate trends throughout this period in the interplay between democracy and economics. More and more leaders within the European Union have pushed against approaching these issues in a democratic fashion for fear (likely reasonable) that the public of states within the union would balk at many of these demands. Given the already lukewarm public stance on the region’s supra-national government, these seem to be ever more bold moves in managing Europe’s economic woes.
The reaction to PM Papandreou’s desire to present a referendum to his nation on whether or not to accept the agreement though perhaps understandable was certainly nothing healthy for the state of the union. Though there would doubtless have been public resistance, opportunities to educate the populace and make clear why hard decisions are sometimes necessary might serve well to create some modicum in public trust of politicians and societal elites.
At this point it is fairly evident that nothing is going to make austerity measures palatable. The populace is aware of the changes coming and the political maneuvering over who is not going to run the country should be more than a bit embarrassing. Greece would certainly be well served by a leader, any leader, willing to handle the current unpleasantries with some manner of dignity and move on toward assisting in the nation’s recovery.
2 Comments
Leave a comment
Sign up for our mailing list
Posts by Region
Posts by Topic
Recent Comments
Archives
- May 2012 (3)
- April 2012 (9)
- March 2012 (16)
- February 2012 (20)
- January 2012 (13)
- December 2011 (10)
- November 2011 (14)
- October 2011 (19)
- September 2011 (25)
- August 2011 (10)
- July 2011 (16)
- June 2011 (14)
- May 2011 (14)
- April 2011 (16)
- March 2011 (20)
- February 2011 (15)
- January 2011 (24)
- December 2010 (16)
- November 2010 (24)
- October 2010 (27)
- September 2010 (17)
- August 2010 (42)
- July 2010 (40)
- June 2010 (65)
- May 2010 (72)
- April 2010 (38)
- March 2010 (18)
- February 2010 (32)
- January 2010 (46)
- December 2009 (45)
- November 2009 (38)
- October 2009 (15)
- September 2009 (24)
- August 2009 (11)
- February 2009 (1)
Who we like
- AfPak Channel
- CIPE Blog
- Countries at the Crossroads
- Cyrus Samii
- Democracy Arsenal
- Democracy Dialogue
- Democracy Digest
- Democracy Resource Center
- EITI Blog
- ElectionGuide.org
- Fruits and Votes
- Global Voices Online
- One Blog
- Open Budgets Blog
- Open Democracy
- Policy and Power
- Progressive Realist
- Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Blogs
- Space for Transparency
- The Coming Prosperity
- The Democratic Piece
- The International Jurist
- The Kaufmann Governance Post
- United Nations Democracy Fund
- Zunia.org




It’s a tough call. Suppose we democratically decide to borrow lots of money and then democratically decide not to pay it back. It’s easy to blame the lender for not considering the risk. At the same time, there is more to democracy than majority rule. Greece’s lenders had good reasons to believe in contract enforcement. That Greece wants to shred this aspect of their democracy because they can’t pay their bills seems like a petulant reaction.
I had a surprising amount of conversations with friends over the EU’s economic woes lately Barak and in large part I agree with you. However I think a good portion of the problem is the sea of disconnect between the state and the populace on issues of the economy. People aren’t expected to understand the ways their nation generates and conserves wealth, nor should they be reasonably, and historically there’s some evidence of nations doing better when they don’t just go along with the economic demands of the broader world. In America when those who govern us contribute to the collapse of our economy due in part to issues of personal gain and business interests, we just sort of look the other way. I think its a good thing that the reaction is not quite the same across the world.