Feb 4, 2012
Genève

“Vigil-aunties”? Exporting the Worst Variety of Citizen Journalism

Controversial American investigative journalism is usually limited to things like Michael Jackson interviews. And when our reality television toes the line, it’s because of Fear Factor episodes where contestants come into contact with disagreeable animal byproducts. Sure, political arguments get heated; sometimes, even, we end up doing it live. But our media, in no small part thanks to the power wielded historically by the FCC, generally self-regulates. For better or for worse.

Not the case in Pakistan. Two weeks ago, a reality television show where participants act like Saudi mutaween, accosting couples appearing together in public, debuted on a major TV network. For an hour, a pack of women chased teenagers and young adults through the streets of Karachi in true religious police fashion. The New York Times writeup, one of many that have cropped up over the past week, describes the show which, most incredibly, was broadcast live, the best:

Panting breathlessly and trailed by a cameraman, the group of about 15 women chased after — sometimes at jogging pace — girls and boys sitting quietly on benches overlooking the Arabian Sea or strolling under the trees. The women peppered them with questions: What were they doing? Did their parents know? Were they engaged?

Some couples reacted with alarm, and tried to scuttle away. A few gave awkward answers. One couple claimed to be married. The show’s host, Maya Khan, 31, demanded to see proof. “So where is your marriage certificate?” she asked sternly.

This hourlong spectacle, broadcast live on Samaa TV on Jan. 17, set off a furious reaction in parts of Pakistan. Outrage sprang from the Internet and percolated into the national newspapers, where writers slammed Ms. Khan’s tactics as a “witch hunt.”

“Vigil-aunties,” read one headline, referring to the South Asian term “aunty” for older, bossy and often judgmental women.

We’ve given an exorbitant amount of credit to citizen journalists in the wake of the Arab Spring. In addition to funding technologies which will increase their effectiveness and safety, the United States is actively training whistleblowers around the world as part of democracy promotion programming. These are the individuals, proponents of this spending say, who hold the key to democratic transition in places we previously overlooked.

Americans and Westerners seem to love it when media is used “for good.” But is that truly a reasonable expectation in places, like Pakistan, where media self-regulation away from extremism is almost incomprehensible? A show such as this one in Pakistan seems like no more than a logical and cultural extension than the United States’ own To Catch a Predator, which, for those not familiar,  lures purported sexual predators into police sting operations using decoys posing as underage teenagers.

When the United States encourages a “gotcha” culture of new media soundbites, live feeds, and citizen activism, what more do we really expect? Journalists using new trends and technologies to enforce the moral code of a society should not surprise anyone.

3 Comments

  • I think you need to distinguish between US government programs and private media. The US government supports the development of an independent media in many countries. However, they are not promoting the creation of this type of gotcha-journalism. The spread of this type of journalism, I suspect, reflects that media corporation know it sells. They see how it works in the US, and, as you accurately observe, adapt it to fit local conditions. I am not saying the programs the US government funds are good or effective. Rather, my point is that you can’t blame the US government for the fact that our private media companies have learned that trashy journalism sells.

  • Nice read Genève, I’ve always sort of figured that this sort of material was preciesly what we should expect in the promotion of a diverse private media. I don’t know that we as a nation are as in love with “media used for good” as we are with the notion of a “free” media in general. I figure it is essentially in line with our affection for the idea of market self-regulation, and that so long as sensationalism is popular, it is what we should expect out of for-profit media.

  • Spot on. Freedom is messy. We just need to take a look at ourselves. The PBS News Hour will never be able to compete against Jersey Shore. Why should we expect people in other countries to be different than we are?

Leave a comment

Founded in 2004, Democracy and Society is a biannual print journal published by the Center for Democracy and Civil Society at Georgetown University. The D&S Blog provides web-only content, including special reports and investigative series, on issues relating to democracy and development.

Sign up for our mailing list

Posts by Region

Posts by Topic

Switch to our mobile site