Compliments from the IMF
The IMF just released a new assessment of the Mozambican economy this past Friday in which it lays extensive compliments to the government’s fiscal and monetary policies. At the same time, the report also recognizes that the poverty level is stagnant and urges a reorientation of growth policies towards more inclusiveness, as discussed previously in this blog.
According to the IMF, growth policies in Mozambique have not been as pro-poor as in other countries with similar growth levels, and seem to become even less pro-poor with time. “The slow poverty reduction reflects structural rigidities and the narrow productive base of the economy, the low production and productivity in the agricultural sector where three-fourths of the population earns its livelihood, and the slow progress in reforming the business environment to induce private sector activity; (…) Finally, there has been little spillover of the megaprojects to the rest of the economy and to job creation.”
The report approves of the government plan for poverty reduction, based on three pillars: 1) production and productivity on the agricultural sector, 2) promoting employment and 3) human and social development.
Those sound all right. We may have a discussion about focusing on agriculture, but in the case of Mozambique that is important because the sector employs 80% of the non-idle work force and is a big component of both exports and GDP. It would be nonetheless crucial to see how exactly these three pillars are being addressed and what results have been achieved.
Finally, they stress some important challenges going forward, “such as with respect to the necessary inter-ministerial coordination and the development of bold sectoral strategies. Nonetheless, the first steps taken in implementing the PARP are encouraging, including in particular the fast-track measures to improve the business environment and the progress made in getting a revamped social protection system off the ground.”
It still sounds like the “stellar” economic growth overshadows concerns with poverty in formal analysis of the Mozambican economy. But at least there is concern with trying to create more opportunities for the poor.
2 Comments
Leave a comment
Posts by Region
Posts by Topic
Recent Comments
- Barak on The Persistence of Justice
- PEstrada on The Persistence of Justice
- Barak on The Persistence of Justice
Archives
- May 2013 (9)
- April 2013 (13)
- March 2013 (19)
- February 2013 (21)
- January 2013 (16)
- December 2012 (12)
- November 2012 (14)
- October 2012 (21)
- September 2012 (21)
- August 2012 (8)
- July 2012 (13)
- June 2012 (17)
- May 2012 (6)
- April 2012 (9)
- March 2012 (16)
- February 2012 (20)
- January 2012 (13)
- December 2011 (10)
- November 2011 (14)
- October 2011 (19)
- September 2011 (25)
- August 2011 (10)
- July 2011 (16)
- June 2011 (14)
- May 2011 (14)
- April 2011 (16)
- March 2011 (20)
- February 2011 (15)
- January 2011 (24)
- December 2010 (16)
- November 2010 (24)
- October 2010 (27)
- September 2010 (17)
- August 2010 (42)
- July 2010 (40)
- June 2010 (65)
- May 2010 (72)
- April 2010 (38)
- March 2010 (18)
- February 2010 (32)
- January 2010 (46)
- December 2009 (45)
- November 2009 (38)
- October 2009 (15)
- September 2009 (24)
- August 2009 (11)
- February 2009 (1)
Who we like
- AfPak Channel
- CIPE Blog
- Countries at the Crossroads
- Cyrus Samii
- Democracy Arsenal
- Democracy Dialogue
- Democracy Digest
- Democracy Resource Center
- EITI Blog
- ElectionGuide.org
- Fruits and Votes
- Global Voices Online
- One Blog
- Open Budgets Blog
- Open Democracy
- Policy and Power
- Progressive Realist
- Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Blogs
- Space for Transparency
- The Coming Prosperity
- The Democratic Piece
- The International Jurist
- The Kaufmann Governance Post
- United Nations Democracy Fund
- Zunia.org




Sounds like a typical IMF analysis – no politics. Rapid growth with little poverty reduction means all the benefits of economic development are flowing outside the country (i.e., to foreign investors) and/or to a narrow economic elite. Who is benefitting from the status quo in Mozambique? Do they have any incentive to change the system? What’s the relationship between powerful economic interests and Frelimo?
[...] few which leaves the vast majority even poorer as it pushes the cost of living up. And even though the IMF congratulates Mozambique for keeping the inflation under control, it is getting undeniably more and more [...]