-
11
Nov
MA student Josh Loh discusses why our strategy in Afghanistan that focuses on government at the national-level is wrong-headed at the democratic piece. According to Loh, counter-insurgency theory suggests building capacity from the bottom-up, not the top-down.
- Published by Barak in: Blog
2 Responses to “Getting it exactly backwards on Afghanistan”
Josh is probably right, all else being equal, to advise holding local elections before national ones. In the context of US Afghanistan policy, however, this prescription suffers from a political obstacle.
The premise of our occupation is that it’s really not an occupation. We are ostensibly there to replace Taliban rule with popular government.
Telling Afghans that they can’t elect national leaders until they are ready (i.e. until local elections sufficiently confer incumbent advantage on aspirants to national office) is contrary to our stated mission. How does one limit self-government when one occupies a country to defend self-government?
*aspirants with acceptable democratic credentials, that is.
Leave a Reply