<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Democracy and Society &#187; Afghanistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/tag/afghanistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog</link>
	<description>Thoughts on democracy and civil society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:03:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Unsolicited advice</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/27/unsolicited-advice/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=unsolicited-advice</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/27/unsolicited-advice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US foreign policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/?p=3009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#8217;t been able to follow the news much the past few weeks, but I did hear about the leak of classified reports stating the war in Afghanistan is going much worse than the Obama administration has publicly suggested. My first thought was &#8220;duh!&#8221; My second thought was that the administration might  want to remember [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t been able to follow the news much the past few weeks, but I did hear about the leak of classified reports stating the war in Afghanistan is going <a href="http://www.democracyarsenal.org/2010/07/who-will-tell-the-people-.html">much worse </a>than the Obama administration has publicly suggested. My first thought was &#8220;duh!&#8221; My second thought was that the administration might  want to remember that &#8220;You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.&#8221; Just saying.</p>
     ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/27/unsolicited-advice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the road again</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/12/on-the-road-again/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=on-the-road-again</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/12/on-the-road-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COIN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/?p=2864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#8217;t been able to post for a few days as I have been more or less traveling non-stop since Saturday (and will continue to do so until Friday): London-Venice (where I am now)-Johannesburg (tomorrow) &#8211; Durban (Wednesday) &#8211; Lusaka (Friday). Sorry to outsource, but Free Range International has another great post on why a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t been able to post for a few days as I have been more or less traveling non-stop since Saturday (and will continue to do so until Friday): London-Venice (where I am now)-Johannesburg (tomorrow) &#8211; Durban (Wednesday) &#8211; Lusaka (Friday). Sorry to outsource, but <a href="http://freerangeinternational.com/blog/?p=3312">Free Range International</a> has another great post on why a more aggressive rules of engagement would have a greater chance of success in Afghanistan than pop-centric coin.</p>
     ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/12/on-the-road-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suicide bomb rocks AfPak border</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/09/suicide-bomb-rocks-afpak-border/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=suicide-bomb-rocks-afpak-border</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/09/suicide-bomb-rocks-afpak-border/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 19:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/?p=2859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[60+ dead; &#62; 100 wounded]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hkiMxbHNH0BqgpWA2ZG6VD6wVTmAD9GRLLE02">60+ dead; &gt; 100 wounded</a></p>
     ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/09/suicide-bomb-rocks-afpak-border/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The art of war</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/07/2831/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=2831</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/07/2831/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 01:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/?p=2831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The caption says &#8220;Taliban score decisive points in the guerrilla war.&#8221; H/T Abu Muqawama.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">The caption says &#8220;Taliban score decisive points in the guerrilla war.&#8221; H/T <a href="http://www.cnas.org/blogs/abumuqawama/2010/07/laffair-rolling-stan-view-beirut.html">Abu Muqawama</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a style="text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/IMG_01901.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2835" title="IMG_0190" src="http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/IMG_01901.jpg" alt="" width="375" height="500" /></a></p>
     ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/07/2831/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No pressure</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/07/no-pressure/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=no-pressure</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/07/no-pressure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 20:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petraeus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/?p=2826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Petraeus &#8220;is, quite literally, the only man for the job. He is the last man standing with the public who can credibly be called upon to not only win the war, but to do the impossible&#8230;It&#8217;s difficult to find a war in American history where so much depended on any one man.&#8221;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/07/give-petraeus-5-stars/59282/">Petraeus</a> &#8220;is, quite literally, the only man for the job. He is the last man standing with the public who can credibly be called upon to not only win the war, but to do the impossible&#8230;It&#8217;s difficult to find a war in American history where so much depended on any one man.&#8221;</p>
     ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/07/no-pressure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thinking before acting is a good idea</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/06/thinking-before-acting-is-a-good-idea/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=thinking-before-acting-is-a-good-idea</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/06/thinking-before-acting-is-a-good-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US foreign policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/?p=2816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Readers of this blog know that I am not a fan of the war in Afghanistan. That being said, I am not on board with the increasing calls that we leave. It&#8217;s not that I think its a good idea to stay or a bad idea to leave. Rather, the answer is I don&#8217;t know [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Readers of this blog know that I am not a fan of the war in Afghanistan. That being said, I am not on board with the <a href="http://www.democracyarsenal.org/2010/07/afghanistan-why-do-we-stay.html">increasing calls</a> that we leave. It&#8217;s not that I think its a good idea to stay or a bad idea to leave. Rather, the answer is I don&#8217;t know what would happen and that&#8217;s a problem.</p>
<p>Leaving Afghanistan could lead to renewed civil war between the Pasthun (i.e., Taliban) and non-Pasthuns (an Afghan solution for certain, but likely a very bloody one). It could lead to greater meddling by other countries in the region, primarily India, Iran, and Pakistan. <a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/sunday-toi/special-report/The-Great-Game/articleshow/6125824.cms">Either could be highly destabilizing</a> and most certainly could have consequences for the US (e.g., increasing tension between India and Pakistan). If parts of this sound familiar, they should because some of this  happened the last time the US hastily abandoned Afghanistan after the Soviets left. Perhaps the negative consequences of these scenarios don&#8217;t justify pouring more money into the country. I don&#8217;t know the answer to these questions and until we get some clarity on them, calls to leave Afghanistan strike me as irresponsible.</p>
     ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/06/thinking-before-acting-is-a-good-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corruption in Afghanistan</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/06/corruption-in-afghanistan/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=corruption-in-afghanistan</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/06/corruption-in-afghanistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USAID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/?p=2814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t blame USAID alone. At least that&#8217;s what I argue at Budget Insight.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t blame USAID alone. At least that&#8217;s what I argue at <a href="http://budgetinsight.wordpress.com/2010/07/06/don’t-blame-usaid-alone-for-corruption-in-afghanistan/">Budget Insight</a>.</p>
     ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/06/corruption-in-afghanistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spinning Afghanistan</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/06/spinning-afghanistan/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=spinning-afghanistan</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/06/spinning-afghanistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 15:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/?p=2811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Naheed Mustafa at Registan: There’s a general sense here that a massive PR push is afoot, to make things look as good as possible to as many people as possible. There’s a drive toward “good news” stories, which isn’t necessarily a problem except that because there are so few, they take on a disproportionate importance. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naheed Mustafa at <a href="http://www.registan.net/index.php/2010/07/06/dispatches-from-afpak-a-tale-of-two-logars-and-the-trip-that-wasn’t/">Registan</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>There’s a general sense here that a massive PR push is afoot, to make things look as good as possible to as many people as possible. There’s a drive toward “good news” stories, which isn’t necessarily a problem except that because there are so few, they take on a disproportionate importance. And no one denies these stories are a deliberate part of the media strategy. They’ll help immensely when Afghans are left to clean up the mess after the internationals are long gone and the world can shrug it off by pointing to the good news and saying Afghanistan was doing ok when we left.</p></blockquote>
     ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/06/spinning-afghanistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jalala-not-so-bad</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/03/jalalabad/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=jalalabad</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/03/jalalabad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 22:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/?p=2764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Free Range International sees some good signs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://freerangeinternational.com/blog/?p=3289">Free Range International</a> sees some good signs.</p>
     ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/03/jalalabad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nita Lowey is still a hypocrite</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/02/nita-lowey-is-still-a-hypocrite/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=nita-lowey-is-still-a-hypocrite</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/02/nita-lowey-is-still-a-hypocrite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 22:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USAID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/?p=2759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#8217;s missing from this press release? It says nothing about military spending in Afghanistan even though it is about 30 times greater than foreign aid and there is massive corruption involved with it. Lowey&#8217;s continued refusal to acknowledge that military spending is a major source of the problem is really unfair to USAID.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s missing from this <a href="http://lowey.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=18&amp;sectiontree=17,18&amp;itemid=613">press release</a>? It says nothing about military spending in Afghanistan even though it is about 30 times greater than foreign aid and there is massive corruption involved with it. Lowey&#8217;s continued refusal to acknowledge that military spending is a major source of the problem is really unfair to USAID.</p>
     ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracyandsociety.com/blog/2010/07/02/nita-lowey-is-still-a-hypocrite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
